Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Thanks from STILETTOS to Nexon for our war matchup :)

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Persia
    started a topic Thanks from STILETTOS to Nexon for our war matchup :)

    Thanks from STILETTOS to Nexon for our war matchup :)

    This is great. We are matched up against an alliance made up completely of Space Age players. We have two Space Agers, and our lowest player is Enlightenment. I mean, weren’t war matchups overhauled a while back? Isn’t this stuff not supposed to happen? I can’t recall a time in this game’s history when this wasn’t an issue. Here are the matchups:

    Us - 2 SA, 3 AA, 4 GA, 1 EA
    Them - 10 SA

    Let’s put it in levels. We average at 204, them at 284. Well, let’s give Nexon some credit: 283.9, so it’s actually only 79.9 levels they have on us, not 80. Phenomenal!

    https://imgur.com/a/bfQrsLt
    Last edited by Persia; 09-11-2019, 08:11 PM.

  • {[Fresh]}Kratos
    replied
    I think this is the result of the now grotesque-becoming space age war weight bug, where some buildings weight less by actually upgrading them.

    The new update announcement says that it will be now fixed, so hopefully no more of this kind of shame matches...

    Leave a comment:


  • jagadeeshgarapati
    replied
    same for us. we 5 SA vs 19SA and we will loose 97 gp

    Leave a comment:


  • TheNecromancer
    replied
    Persia, I recognize your profile pic as Raphael. I could tell you a funny story about Raphael

    Leave a comment:


  • qi1ln
    replied
    Terrible matchmaking. If possible, post the line up screenshot. Hopefully, Nexon will see it.

    Leave a comment:


  • phil_dee
    replied
    Our #1 (Space Age, level 304 with a Bazooka Sentry) was cleared by the enemy #18 in our current war, after many of their bases also increased and decreased in age at will during Planning Day. Good times

    Leave a comment:


  • No Angel
    replied
    We'll get over it 😊 We've had terrible mismatches before and a few was won over but this one was too terrible. Tweaking the lineup is not a choice if half of the alliance weren't available/reliable for war. And to be honest, not everyone is a decent attacker who'd be able to 5 star SA bases being AA.
    Shouldn't have happened if the algorithm WAS fixed. Blame the matchmaking.

    Leave a comment:


  • kilgore_trout
    replied
    For a little more perspective, their 9 and 10 both 5 starred our 1.

    Leave a comment:


  • SomeRandomPlayer
    replied
    Convince those 4 Global Age players to go Atomic ASAP, and to focus on Offense (e.g., 7-8 planes), and with a little luck you might win

    Leave a comment:


  • No Angel
    replied
    Cannibals it was about 20-30 minutes, not too long.

    Leave a comment:


  • LordStark263AC
    replied
    -197 is a lot of Glory to lose. Terrible mismatch

    Leave a comment:


  • Persia
    commented on 's reply
    443, -197. No idea what the search time was. No Angel

  • Cannibals
    replied
    Sorry you didn’t get a fun war. What is the glory reward for win/loss? And the search time?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X